Changes to R&D- Two Step Forwards and One Back

John Lester of the School of Public Policy recently released a report which analyzed the changes to Canada’s innovation polices as per the 2012 federal budget.

The budget makes some sensible changes to the SR&ED program, but Lester argues that the decision to reduce support for large firms is a step in the wrong direction.  Based on his analysis, Lester proposes that imposing a flat 20 percent tax incentive for firms of all sizes would create a increase in the net economic benefit from the SR&ED tax incentive.

Lester also argues that high delivery costs are preventing IRAP from generating a net economic benefit. Unless costs are reduced from delivery, the additional funding allocated to IRAP will substantially increase the net loss from the program.

This entry was posted in Changes to SR&ED and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>